Essential session storage is required to sign in. Optional analytics remain off unless you allow them.
Design how you'd run 1:1s for a small team and practice giving real feedback. Deliver: (1) a 1:1 operating doc — cadence (weekly), who owns the agenda (the report), the purpose (trust/coaching/issues, NOT status), a shared running-notes template, and 5-6 good open questions you'd keep in your back pocket; and (2) TWO written feedback examples using the SBI model (Situation-Behavior-Impact) — one reinforcing (a strength) and one redirecting (a problem) — that demonstrate Radical Candor (Care Personally AND Challenge Directly), avoiding both ruinous empathy and obnoxious aggression. Note how you'd create psychological safety so hard topics actually surface.
Weekly cadence; report-owned agenda; framed for trust/coaching (not status); good open questions; running notes.
Both examples use SBI correctly and land in the Radical Candor quadrant (care + challenge), not ruinous empathy or aggression.
Shows concrete ways to make it safe to raise problems and admit mistakes.
Use this README structure to make the work reviewable.
DevPath fetches a read-only, size-capped snapshot. Submitted code is never executed.
# A 1:1 system & first feedback ## Goal Design how you'd run 1:1s for a small team and practice giving real feedback. Deliver: (1) a 1:1 operating doc — cadence (weekly), who owns the agenda (the report), the purpose (trust/coaching/issues, NOT status), a shared running-notes template, and 5-6 good open questions you'd keep in your back pocket; and (2) TWO written feedback examples using the SBI model (Situation-Behavior-Impact) — one reinforcing (a strength) and one redirecting (a problem) — that demonstrate Radical Candor (Care Personally AND Challenge Directly), avoiding both ruinous empathy and obnoxious aggression. Note how you'd create psychological safety so hard topics actually surface. ## Acceptance criteria - [ ] 1:1 design: Weekly cadence; report-owned agenda; framed for trust/coaching (not status); good open questions; running notes. - [ ] Feedback quality: Both examples use SBI correctly and land in the Radical Candor quadrant (care + challenge), not ruinous empathy or aggression. - [ ] Psychological safety: Shows concrete ways to make it safe to raise problems and admit mistakes. ## Verification - [ ] Document installation and run commands. - [ ] Record automated checks and their exact commands. - [ ] Add representative output, screenshots, or a short demo where useful. - [ ] Confirm failure paths and known constraints. ## Decision log ### Decision title - Context: - Choice: - Alternatives considered: - Tradeoffs: ## Evidence - Link each rubric criterion to the file, test, or artifact that demonstrates it. ## Known limitations - List what is intentionally out of scope and what should be improved next.